Gaming Blog

Scorn on Xbox Series X: our first look at AMD’s FSR 2 on consoles


Scorn is likely one of the most visually distinctive video games launched in latest instances. Clearly impressed by the work of HR Giger, the sport’s environments marry mechanical intricacy with biology to create a extremely unnerving expertise. It is sci-fi, however not hi-tech, with analogue mechanics, skeletal metalwork, and the occasional glimpse of one thing actually alive.

On the floor, Scorn seems like a first-person shooter, however it has extra in widespread with Myst or The Witness than Doom. It is a slow-paced, brooding title that requires puzzle-solving and cautious exploration – however with a small group on the helm and a virtually 10-year improvement cycle, is that this Unreal Engine 4-based recreation correctly polished? And on Xbox Sequence X, simply how good is AMD’s FSR 2 picture reconstruction?

Scorn’s visible design is pitch-perfect from the second you take a look at the title display. The environments are extremely ambiguous – vaguely mechanical, however ribbed with bone-like arches and inlaid with vascular tubing. All the pieces is dilapidated, worn and glistening with moisture. However some mechanisms nonetheless appear to work, and trace at some bigger, unknown objective. As you progress, the natural parts take over, with guts and veins splayed out throughout. Humanoid creatures could be discovered, fused into weird preparations or discarded like trash. Your character isn’t any completely different – shortly into the sport, you are attacked by a parasite, which slowly envelops you. The sport’s type is unusual, uncomfortable, and wholly distinctive in gaming.

A take a look at Scorn on Xbox Sequence X and Sequence S consoles.

Count on to see distinctive and breathtaking art work for each location within the recreation. Decaying ceilings with gentle flooding in, elaborate contraptions surrounded in mist, a temple criss-crossed by webs of flesh – it is all eye-catching and visually compelling. A lot care and a focus to element has been packed into each house. All that art work can be for naught if the know-how wasn’t there to again it up, in fact. Scorn advantages quite a bit from its restricted scope and reliance on static opaque fashions to essentially ramp up the general stage of constancy. There is a ton of geometry carved into each floor, as an example. The extent of consistency is admittedly one thing right here, notably for a smaller-budget recreation. Maps are ornate and detail-rich in a means that few different video games can match.

However that is to not say that all the things is ideal. For starters, despite the fact that Scorn is a current-gen unique – launched on Sequence S, Sequence X, and PC – the general visible impression is unquestionably of a last-gen recreation, albeit an excellent-looking one. Do not anticipate something in the way in which of boundary-pushing rendering options like ray tracing, for instance, and whereas environments do look very dense at affordable distances, at point-blank vary you possibly can see the constraints of conventional geometry meshes, particularly those who had been designed across the constraints of older {hardware} platforms.

Decision metrics are literally fairly easy on the floor: Sequence S renders at 1080p internally, whereas Sequence X hits 1440p. I examined throughout quite a lot of scenes and could not discover proof of decrease pixel counts, although dynamic decision is a risk. Nonetheless, once I began to look at picture high quality extra carefully, I observed a handful of oddities – elements that recommend using some actually cutting-edge know-how.

Xbox Sequence X presents nigh-on identically to the PC model operating FSR 2 high quality mode at 4K, whereas Sequence S on the appropriate is a match for PC at 1080p with straight TAA. Click on on the pictures for increased decision variations.

The primary, most blatant clue is the distinction in resolved element between the 2 machines. Whereas Sequence S appears very 1080p-like, Sequence X has an total resolve that appears strikingly much like 4K, even at very shut viewing distances. Certainly, the presentation holds up effectively even towards the absolutely maxed-out PC expertise – with solely small, artefact-ridden trails on particle results. The difficulty right here is that these parts do not have movement vectors, so sure temporal AA strategies can battle with them at instances.

The PC model helps reconstruction – however solely AMD’s FidelityFX Tremendous Decision 2 (FSR 2) and operating that at high quality mode produces an impact that is visually equivalent to Xbox Sequence S, proper all the way down to the identical points with particles. The stereotypical FSR 2 picture high quality flaw – important disocclusion artifacting – is far tougher to watch right here on Sequence X, nevertheless. Sometimes FSR 2 presents with a type of fizzling artifact sample when sure display parts are uncovered. There may be some disocclusion artifacting on Xbox Sequence X, however it tends to be fairly delicate.

I do suppose that there are just a few key elements that make disocclusion much less of a difficulty on this explicit recreation although. Scorn has a first-person perspective with out complicated animation, a low-contrast visible type, and lots of movie grain, which may’t be turned off. Finally, the sport’s first-person perspective and particular aesthetic are a superb match for FSR 2 and as my work on the sport reached its conclusion, I did really obtain affirmation from the developer that AMD’s good upscaler is in place on the Sequence X model.

Except for single body drops in traversal, Scorn on Xbox Sequence S is basically a locked 60 frames per second – principally no complaints right here.

Sequence S? It is a straight 1080p, with no apparent upsampling. The usage of FSR 2 is important, as that is to our data the primary deployment of FSR 2 in a console title. Whereas there hasn’t been any technical barrier precluding builders from utilizing FSR 2 in console video games since its launch a number of months in the past, improvement timelines have appeared to preclude its speedy integration in console software program.

Efficiency-wise, Sequence S gives a nearly locked 60fps replace all through the run of play. Fight, cutscenes, exploration – all of it runs with out problem. I did discover that the junior Xbox would sometimes drop a single body throughout traversal in additional demanding environments however this wasn’t a standard problem and wasn’t notably noticeable.

Sequence X is basically the identical – a typically stable 60fps with the odd duplicate body. However there are just a few areas the place the sport suffers from extra critical frame-rate points. The sport’s cutscenes can endure from efficiency drops, together with the opening sequence, which dips as little as 43fps. Fight can typically provoke a momentary frame-rate drop, notably when alpha results are onscreen. Lastly, there are just a few cases the place the surroundings itself was complicated sufficient to trigger a chronic efficiency problem. It is necessary to emphasize that the Sequence X is at 60fps the overwhelming majority of the time, however these efficiency points are curious.

Apparently, Xbox Sequence X doesn’t run as easily as Sequence S, dropping efficiency in some cutscenes and to a lesser extent throughout gameplay. The drops are sporadic however they’re there. FSR 2 is a superb upscaler, however it does have its personal computational price which can clarify among the points right here.

I say that as a result of the Sequence X sometimes delivers a a lot bigger decision benefit over Sequence S than what we’re seeing right here. 1080p to 1440p is only a 78 p.c enchancment in uncooked pixel rely, whereas 1080p to 4K or 1080p to 1800p is a extra widespread divide in typical decision between the 2 machines. There is not any readily obvious distinction in different visible settings between the consoles both – so what is going on on?

Properly, upsampling strategies do have a frame-time price, and extra superior strategies take extra time to compute. FSR 2 could be notably costly and it is attainable that it might take a number of milliseconds to compute per 4K body on Sequence X. Inside a 16.7ms body, that is a fairly large chunk of time, which might clarify why Sequence X falls behind Sequence S in efficiency regardless of solely a reasonable uptick in uncooked pixel rely. It additionally hints at why we aren’t seeing comparable upsampling tech on the S – the computational price might merely be too giant. In brief, high-end upscaling options like FSR 2 are clearly good for console gaming, however they arrive at a value – there is no ‘free lunch’ in utilizing them.

Returning to the sport itself, Scorn is not for everybody. It is cryptic, slow-paced, and really laborious. You are dumped right into a world with none instruction and anticipated to determine easy methods to progress with little in the way in which of clues. It bears some similarity to old-school journey video games, and is intentionally obtuse in a lot the identical means. Plus there is no textual content, no dialogue, and a virtually non-existent plot. It is an incredible match for Recreation Move, as Scorn is a recreation that is effectively value attempting, however I think many gamers will not have the drive to progress very far. It may take a sure type of gamer to essentially savour what this recreation has to supply – however these gamers will discover lots of visible rewards awaiting them. Scorn delivers a dense, fantastically designed world that always seems exceptional.


Related Articles

Back to top button