Trending Politics

These Attorneys Are Fighting To Expose The Racist History That Made Crossing The US Border Without Documents A Crime


Ahilan Arulanantham, an legal professional who wrote a quick supporting the problem to unlawful entry and reentry, represented immigrants going through reentry expenses when he was a federal public defender within the border metropolis of El Paso, Texas. Most of them had been individuals who had households after having lived within the US for years and had been deported after being convicted of a criminal offense. Some would attempt to stay within the Mexican metropolis of Juárez, which is true throughout from El Paso, however couldn’t bear being separated from their households and returned to the US, he mentioned.

However they’d encounter severe points in the event that they got here again and encountered Border Patrol or different legislation enforcement brokers who realized that they had been beforehand deported, mentioned Arulanantham, who’s now codirector of the Heart for Immigration Regulation and Coverage at UCLA College of Regulation. The middle has been serving to lead a public consciousness marketing campaign round unlawful re-entry.

“They’d go to jail for years typically,” he mentioned. “The influence of that’s going to go on for years for having come again to see household.”

Efrain Leonides-Seguria, a 46-year-old Mexican man, is without doubt one of the 1000’s of undocumented immigrants who’ve been charged with unlawful entry. Leonides-Seguria mentioned he got here to the US chasing the “American dream” he’d typically heard about rising up within the state of Guerrero. In 1997, Leonides-Seguria crossed the border in Arizona and began planting roots.

“I needed to search out out for myself if it was true,” Leonides-Seguria advised BuzzFeed Information. “However with time, you understand that, sure, you reside a bit extra comfortably right here, but it surely’s additionally hectic.”

Within the years that adopted, Leonides-Seguria had 4 daughters, a son, and a granddaughter. He made a residing working in a paper manufacturing unit within the suburbs of Chicago and continued practising martial arts for a number of years, a sport he had picked up in Mexico. That was till he was deported in December 2009 after being convicted of driving whereas intoxicated, in response to court docket data. It was the primary of 5 instances he’d be deported, one extra time following one other DUI conviction and the others after being caught by Border Patrol.

Leonides-Seguria was additionally convicted of aggravated illegal use of a weapon and sentenced to 18 months’ probation in October 2001, in response to court docket data. In Could 2021, he was convicted for aggravated driving underneath the affect and violating his digital monitoring. He was sentenced to 3 years and three months in jail.

He has additionally been convicted of unlawful reentry two instances and was sentenced to 10 months for each, court docket data present. An illegal-reentry conviction, nonetheless, can lead to an immigrant being sentenced to as much as two years, however might be as excessive as as much as 20 years, relying on their prison document.

Leonides-Seguria mentioned he didn’t know he might be charged with reentry till he was caught attempting to enter the US undetected by Border Patrol after his first deportation. But regardless of the jail time, he saved attempting his luck at returning after every deportation as a result of he mentioned his youngsters wanted him. The primary time he was deported his son and daughter had been nonetheless in elementary college.

“They honestly wanted me,” he mentioned. “I needed to offer them a daily life, not a foul life, not an impressive life, however a traditional, common life.”

He by no means anticipated to spend a lot time behind bars, nor did the boys detained alongside him.

“You lose an excessive amount of your time locked up,” Leonides-Seguria mentioned. “It’s not value it.”

In September, he misplaced his bid to get his newest illegal-reentry cost dismissed when a federal choose in Illinois dominated that the DOJ had met the burden of displaying the 1929 legislation would have handed whatever the racial bias.

If the federal defenders prevail within the ninth Circuit, the federal government can be prevented from prosecuting immigrants for coming into the US with out authorization in areas underneath its purview. It wouldn’t cease the deportations, although. If that occurs, the Justice Division will virtually actually enchantment to the Supreme Court docket.

Research have proven that punishing immigrants for the act of coming into the nation with out authorization hardly ever deters them from attempting and merely pushes them to take extra harmful routes to enter the US.

Joanna Williams, government director of the Kino Border Initiative, a nonprofit primarily based on either side of the Arizona border, mentioned she has seen immigrants more and more try and cross the desert as a result of they need to reunite with their US citizen youngsters — regardless of the risks.

As a result of a majority of immigrants and asylum-seekers are being shortly expelled again to Mexico or their dwelling nations underneath the Trump-era pandemic coverage, these mother and father will most definitely not be criminally charged, however they’ll virtually most actually be blocked from coming into the US if caught, Williams mentioned.

And even when immigrants know they might face federal jail time for crossing, they nonetheless weigh the dangers towards being separated from their youngsters, she added.

“How do you weigh being separated out of your youngsters for the remainder of your life between going to jail?” ●


Related Articles

Back to top button